![]() ![]() Pretty quickly, the developers realize from overwhelming feedback that they've made a mistake. It's rare that I come across a program that has such a poor interface for so long. Or, how about, "Photoshop's interface might not be the most intuitive, but The GIMP's interface is demonstrably, and substantially, worse." We still can wholeheartedly agree with the latter one only!" That gave us a few questionable monikers like 'Photoshop for Linux', 'free Photoshop', and 'that ugly piece of software'. The project's celebration page says volunteers did their "best to provide a sensible workflow to users by using common user interface patterns. As the program added features such as layers, it grew more popular and eventually became a byword for offering a FOSS alternative to Photoshop even though the project pushes back against that description. Today the program is released under the GNU General Public License. ![]() Richard Stallman gave Mattis and Kimball permission to change the "General" in its name to "GNU", reflecting its open-source status. The answer to the file format support question turned out to be GIF, JPEG, PNG, TIFF, and XPM. The software ran on Linux 1.2.13, Solaris 2.4, HPUX 9.05, and SGI IRIX. Out of curiosity (and maybe something else), I have a few (2) questions: What kind of features should it have? (tools, selections, filters, etc.) What file formats should it support? (jpeg, gif, tiff, etc.)" Four months later, Mattis and fellow University of California Berkeley student Spencer Kimball delivered what they described as software "designed to provide an intuitive graphical interface to a variety of image editing operations." A brief celebration post detailed how the package started life as a July 1995 Usenet thought bubble by then-student Peter Mattis, who posted the following to several newsgroups: Suppose someone decided to write a graphical image manipulation program (akin to photoshop). New submitter thegreatbob shares a report: The General Image Manipulation Program, GIMP, has turned 25.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |